| Hearing Date | Diary | Status | Units / Application | Witness | Court |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18-DEC-2025 Restored (1) |
For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas | |
| 25-NOV-2025 Restored (1) |
25-11-2025. Matter called. The attorney of applicant/plaintiff Asif Anwar is called absent. Learned counsel for applicant/plaintiff is called absent his associate Mr. Rana Raheel advocate is present. The opponents/ defendants are called absent. Process issued upon official opponents / defendants returned served as per bailiff report. Order on it. Order passed on separate sheet & announced in open court. As per Order. Since the address of defendant No.01 pertains to Toba Tek Sindh Punjab, therefore applicant side/plaintiff is directed to procure service upon defendant No.01 through concerned court. Office is directed to issue letter accordingly. Put off to-------18-12-2025 for service. Issue notice to opponent / defendant No.01 on application U/o 09 rule 09 CPC address to Hon'ble District & Sessions Judge District Toba Tek Singh for service through Hon'ble District & Sessions Judge Mirpurkhas as well as register post/A/D & TCS on costs. | For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas |
| 01-NOV-2025 Restored (1) |
Matter called. Attorney of applicant/plaintiff namely Asif Anwar called absent. Learned counsel for applicant/plaintiff called absent. Opponents/ defendants called absent. Process upon opponent / defendant not returned back. Honourable High Court of Sindh, Karachi declared today as holiday due to Sindh Bar council election 2025-2030 while offices will remain open. Put off to----------------------------------25-11-2025 for Service. The applicant/plaintiff is directed to deposit process fee as early as possible. Repeat Notice to opponent/defendants on application U/o 09 rule 09 CPC through bailiff as well as through register post AD on cost. | For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas |
| 11-OCT-2025 Restored (1) |
11-10-2025. Matter called. P.O is on C/L. The attorney of applicant /plaintiff is called absent. Learned counsel for applicant/plaintiff is called absent. Process upon opponent / defendant not issued by office for want of costs. Put up to------01-11-2025 for service. The applicant/plaintiff is directed to deposit process fee as early as possible. Issue notice to opponent/defendants on application U/o 09 rule 09 CPC through bailiff as well as through register post AD on cost. | For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas |
| 22-SEP-2025 Restored (1) |
Application under section 9 rule 9 CPC called. Applicant/plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for applicant/plaintiff called absent. Process upon opponent/defendant not issued by office due to non-deposit process fees by plaintiff side. Matter adjourned with notice of caution to plaintiff/applicant side. Put up to----------------------11.10.2025 for service. Issue notice to opponent/defendants on application under order 9 rule 9 CPC through bailiff as well as through register post AD on cost. | For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas |
| 03-JUL-2025 Restored (1) |
The F.C. Suit was called. The attorney of the Plaintiff, Asif Anwar, was called but found absent. The learned counsel for the Plaintiff was also absent. The Defendants were called but remained absent. However, the learned Deputy District Attorney (DDA) for Official Defendants Nos. 2 to 5 was present. Order was passed in open Court. As per record, the instant suit was previously dismissed for non-prosecution on 30.11.2024. Subsequently, the learned counsel for the Plaintiff filed an application under Order IX Rule 9 CPC, which was allowed on 04.02.2025, and the matter was restored to its original stage, i.e., service, but plaintiff failed to serve the notice. Thereafter, this Court passed orders dated 15.05.2025 and 24.05.2025, directing the Plaintiff???s side to issue summons to the private Defendants through the concerned Court as well as through courier service at their own cost. However, the Plaintiff's side failed to comply with these directions???neither were the summons sent through the concerned Court, nor was a single summons dispatched via courier. In view of the Plaintiff???s non-compliance and continuous absence, the suit is again dismissed for non-prosecution, with no order as to costs. |
For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas |
| 29-MAY-2025 Restored (1) |
F.C. Suit was called. The attorney of the Plaintiff, Asif Anwar, was called but found absent. The learned counsel for the Plaintiff is present. Process not returned served or un-served. Defendants called absent. The learned Deputy District Attorney (DDA) for Official Defendants Nos. 2 to 5 is present. Put up on--------------------03-07-2025 for service. Issue summons to private defendants through concerned Court, as well as through Courier on cost. | For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas |
| 24-MAY-2025 Restored (1) |
F.C. Suit was called. The attorney of the Plaintiff, Asif Anwar, was called but found absent. The learned counsel for the Plaintiff called absent. Process not issued by office. Defendants called absent. The learned Deputy District Attorney (DDA) for Official Defendants Nos. 2 to 5 is present. Order passed on separate sheet, as per order, notice of caution to plaintiff side to deposit process fees for issuance of summons, failing which, the instant matter deemed to be dismissed in accordance with law. Put up on--------------29-05-2025 for service. Issue summons to private defendants through concerned Court, as well as through Courier on cost. Learned counsel for plaintiff is required to deposit process fees for issuance of summons to defendants. | For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas |
| 15-MAY-2025 Restored (1) |
F.C. Suit was called. The attorney of the Plaintiff, Asif Anwar, was called but found absent. The learned counsel for the Plaintiff is present. Process returned served and un-served, as per endorsement of bailiff of this Court. Defendants called absent. The learned Deputy District Attorney (DDA) for Official Defendants Nos. 2 to 5 is present. Order passed on separate sheet, as per order, service upon official defendants was already held good, however, issue summons to private defendants through concerned Court as well as through Courier on cost. Put up on---------24-05-2025 for service. Issue summons to private defendants through concerned Court, as well as through Courier on cost. | For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas |
| 07-MAY-2025 Restored (1) |
F.C. Suit was called. The attorney of the Plaintiff, Asif Anwar, was called but found absent. The learned counsel for the Plaintiff called absent. The Defendants called absent. The learned Deputy District Attorney (DDA) for Official Defendants Nos. 2 to 5 is present. Matter adjourned with notice of caution to either party. Put up on-------------15-05-2025 for service. Issue a Court Motion Notice to both parties to proceed with the case. | For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas |