22-AUG-2026
|
|
For Service |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge V, Hyderabad
|
19-AUG-2026
|
Due to strike called by the DBA Hyderabad the work is suspend. Application U/O 12(2) CPC and application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC are called. Plaintiff is absent. Advocate for plaintiff is absent. None else is in attendance. Applicant/Intervener being defendant No.6(LRs) are absent. Advocate Mr.Muhammad Kamran Qureshi on behalf of Applicant/intervener Defendant No.6(a to c & e & f) is present. Applicant/Intervener Deen Muhammad ( In Application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC) is absent while his counsel Mr.Muhammad Shoaib is present. Contemner Mst. Farzana and Mst. Nazia and their counsel Mr.Muhammad Ali Rajput are absent. Summons through bailiff by way of pasting returned duly pasted as per endorsement of bailiff, his statement is recorded on oath at Ex.70 he produced relevant annexures at Ex.70/A to Ex.70/C. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 22-08-2026. For Service upon contemner No.1,2 & 5 to 8 through bailiff, registered post AD and courier service in application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC filed by the applicant Deen Muhammad.. 2) Service upon plaintiff and defendants No.6(d) in application U/S 12 (2) CPC filed by the Defendant No.6(a to c & e & f) through publication in notified newspaper. |
For Service |
.5 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge V, Hyderabad
|
04-AUG-2026
|
Due to strike called by the DBA Hyderabad the work is suspend. Application U/O 12(2) CPC and application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC are called. Plaintiff is absent. Advocate for plaintiff is absent. None else is in attendance. Applicant/Intervener being defendant No.6(LRs) are absent. Advocate Mr.Muhammad Kamran Qureshi on behalf of Applicant/intervener Defendant No.6(a to c & e & f) is present. Applicant/Intervener Deen Muhammad ( In Application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC) is present with his counsel Mr.Muhammad Shoaib is present. Contemner Mst. Farzana and Mst. Nazia are absent while thier counsel Mr.Muhammad Ali Rajput is present. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 19-08-2026. For Service upon contemner No.1,2 & 5 to 8 through bailiff, registered post AD and courier service in application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC filed by the applicant Deen Muhammad.. 2) Service upon plaintiff and defendants No.6(d) through bailiff by way of pasting in presence of two witnesses in application U/S 12 (2) CPC filed by the Defendant No.6(a to c & e & f). |
For Service |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge V, Hyderabad
|
30-JUL-2026
|
Application U/O 12(2) CPC and application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC are called. Plaintiff is absent. Advocate for plaintiff is absent. Mr.Muhammad Ali Rajput is present and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of Contemner Mst. Farzana and Mst. Nazia at Ex.68 as well as filed joint statement at Ex.69. Order on it 'File'. None else is in attendance. Applicant/Intervener being defendant No.6(LRs) are absent. Advocate Mr.Muhammad Kamran Qureshi on behalf of Applicant/intervener Defendant No.6(a to c & e & f) is present. Applicant/Intervener Deen Muhammad is present with his counsel Mr.Muhammad Shoaib.. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 04-08-2026. For Service upon contemner No.1,2 & 5 to 8 through bailiff, registered post AD and courier service in application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC filed by the applicant Deen Muhammad.. 2) Service upon plaintiff and defendants No.6(d) through bailiff by way of pasting in presence of two witnesses in application U/S 12 (2) CPC filed by the Defendant No.6(a to c & e & f). |
For Service |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge V, Hyderabad
|
27-JUL-2026
|
Application U/O 12(2) CPC and application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC are called. Plaintiff is absent. Advocate for plaintiff is absent. Summons to defendant No.6(d) through bailiff returned unserved as per endorsement of bailiff. None else is in attendance. Applicant/Intervener being defendant No.6(LRs) are absent. Advocate Mr.Muhammad Kamran Qureshi on behalf of Applicant/intervener Defendant No.6(LRs) is absent. Applicant/Intervener Deen Muhammad is present with his counsel Mr.Muhammad Shoaib.. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 30-07-2026. For Service upon contemner in application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC filed by the Deen Muhammad.. 2) Service upon plaintiff and defendants in application U/S 12 (2) CPC filed by the Defendant No.6(a to c & e & f). |
For Service |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge V, Hyderabad
|
13-NOV-2025
|
The matter is fixed for auction proceedings in complaince of the preliminary decree, meanwhile the Advocate for defendant No.6 appeared and filed an application U/O 22 Rule 4 CPC, praying therein to implead the legal heirs of Defendant No.6(g) as she has been passed away during the auction proceedings, order passed on the application, "the application is is allowed. It is already on record that the original defendant No. 6, Muhammad Saleem, had expired during the pendency of the suit, and in that regard the plaintiff had filed an amended title impleading his legal heirs. Now, since the wife of defendant No. 6, namely Mst. Zareena, who was also arrayed as defendant No. 6(g), has expired, there is no requirement for filing a fresh amended title. The earlier amended title already contains the names of the same legal heirs, and the proceedings shall simply stand abated to the extent of deceased Mst. Zareena. The Nazir is accordingly directed to proceed further with the matter strictly in accordance with the judgment and decree dated 14-12-2024." Counsel for the defendant No. 1 is also appeared and filed an application U/S 151 CPC praying to halt the auction proceeding as defendant no.1 intends to purchase the suit property, heard arguments of the learned counsel where after order passed on the application same is dismissed. "no valid ground exists to interfere with or stop the auction proceedings. The application, being devoid of merits, is hereby dismissed. However, the applicant is at liberty to participate in the auction proceedings and to purchase the property in accordance with law, subject to fulfilment of all legal requirements." |
Advocate to be Heard |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge V, Hyderabad
|
23-DEC-2024
|
Matter is already preliminary decreed on previous date of hearing. Office is directed to consign the R &Ps to the Record Room Civil Court Building Hyderabad. |
For Arguments |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge V, Hyderabad
|
14-DEC-2024
|
Matter called. Adv. for plaintiff is present. Adv. for Defendant No.1 & 6 is also present. DDA for official defendants No.8 & 9 is present. None appeared from rest of the defendants, Heard final arguments of both sides where after judgment passed at Ex.65 and announced in open court in late hours the suit of plaintiff is preliminary decreed per findings recorded therein. Office is directed to prepare preliminary decree. |
For Arguments |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge V, Hyderabad
|
07-DEC-2024
|
Matter called. Adv. for plaintiff is absent. Adv. for Defendant No.1 & 6 is absent. DDA for official defendants No.8 & 9 is present. None appeared from rest of the defendants, final argument are still to be heard. put off to 14.12.2024 for 1) Final Arguments. |
For Arguments |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge V, Hyderabad
|
30-NOV-2024
|
Matter called. Adv. for plaintiff is present. Attorney Irfan of LRs Defendant.No.1 to 6 is present. Adv. for Defendant No.1 & 6 is present. DDA for official defendants No.8 & 9 is also present. None appeared from rest of the defendants. Counsel for Defendant No.6(g) submitted statement at Ex.63 adopting the joint written statement as filed earlier at Ex.19 as written statement on behlaf of Defendant No 6 (g). Order on it. DW-1 namely Muhammad Irfan Shaikh is cross-examined to Miss Sabab Lakho adv. for plaintiff, statement of side closed is submitted by adv. for defendant No.1 & 6 at Ex.64 Order on it. put off to 07.12.2024 for 1) Final Arguments. |
For Evidence |
.5 |
1 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge V, Hyderabad
|