27-NOV-2025
|
|
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ , Hala
|
20-NOV-2025
|
Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff is present. Defendant called absent but his counsel is present. Learned DDA on behalf of official defendant No.05 to 09 is present. Advocate of palintiffs stated that the compromise talks are going on between parties. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned with a cautionary note to the plaintiffs side that, in case of failure, Section 17(3) CPC shall be invoked against them. Put off to----27.11.2025 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ , Hala
|
11-NOV-2025
|
Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff is present. Defendant called absent but his counsel is present. Learned DDA on behalf of official defendant No.05 to 09 is present. Advocate of defendant submitted an application for adjournment at Ex.28. Order passed on it. Allowed in the interest of justice. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned with a cautionary note to the plaintiffs side that, in case of failure, Section 17(3) CPC shall be invoked against them. Put off to----20.11.2025 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ , Hala
|
17-OCT-2025
|
Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff called absent, but counsel is present. Defendant called absent but his counsel is present. Clerk of Learned DDA on behalf of official defendant No.05 to 09 is present. Advocate of defendant submitted an application for adjournment at Ex.27. Order passed on it. Allowed in the interest of justice. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned with a cautionary note to the plaintiffs side that, in case of failure, Section 17(3) CPC shall be invoked against them. Put off to-----11.11.2025 for evidence of plaintiff side |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ , Hala
|
03-OCT-2025
|
Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff called absent, but counsel is present. Defendant and his counsel are called absent, but junior is present. Learned DDA on behalf of official defendant No.05 to 09 is present. The junior/munchi of advocate for defendants submitted application for adjournment at Ex.25. Order passed on it. Allowed in the interest of justice. Advocate for plaintiff did not press the application U/O 39 RULE 1 AND 2 CPC. Order passed on separate sheet. The application is dismissed as not pressed. see order at ex. 26 The record reflects that issues were framed by this Court on 08.05.2024, and subsequently, only one official witness, namely Shoukat Ali (Tapedar Tapo Khatiro/Mukhtiarkar Taluka Saeed), was examined on 05.09.2024. Since then, no further witness has been examined by the learned counsel for the plaintiff. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned with a cautionary note to the plaintiffs side that, in case of failure, Section 17(3) CPC shall be invoked against them. Put off to------- 17.10.2025 for evidence of plaintiff side |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ , Hala
|
18-SEP-2025
|
Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff called absent, but counsel is present. Defendant and his counsel are called absent, but junior is present. Learned DDA on behalf of official defendant No.05 to 09 is present. The advocate for plaintiff submitted application for adjournment at Ex.24. The record reflects that issues were framed by this Court on 08.05.2024, and subsequently, only one official witness, namely Shoukat Ali (Tapedar Tapo Khatiro/Mukhtiarkar Taluka Saeed), was examined on 05.09.2024. Since then, no further witness has been examined by the learned counsel for the plaintiff. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned with a cautionary note to the plaintiffs side that, in case of failure, Section 17(3) CPC shall be invoked against them. Put off to------- 03.10.2025 for evidence of plaintiff side/ arguments on application under order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ , Hala
|
08-SEP-2025
|
Instant matter is fixed on 05th day of September, 2025, which was declared as public holiday, hence matter is taken up today i.e. 08th Day of September, 2025. Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff called absent, but counsel is present. Defendant and his counsel are called absent, but junior is present. Learned DDA on behalf of official defendant No.05 to 09 is present. The record reflects that issues were framed by this Court on 08.05.2024, and subsequently, only one official witness, namely Shoukat Ali (Tapedar Tapo Khatiro/Mukhtiarkar Taluka Saeed), was examined on 05.09.2024. Since then, no further witness has been examined by the learned counsel for the plaintiff. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned with a cautionary note to the plaintiffs side that, in case of failure, Section 17(3) CPC shall be invoked against them. Put off to------- 18.09.2025 for evidence of plaintiff side/ arguments on application under order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ , Hala
|
22-AUG-2025
|
Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff called absent, but counsel is present and submitted application for adjournment on the ground that compromise talks is going between the parties at Ex. 22. Order passed on it. Defendant and his counsel are called absent, but junior is present and he also submitted application for adjournment at ex. 23. Order passed on it. Learned DDA on behalf of official defendant No.05 to 09 is present. The record reflects that issues were framed by this Court on 08.05.2024, and subsequently, only one official witness, namely Shoukat Ali (Tapedar Tapo Khatiro/Mukhtiarkar Taluka Saeed), was examined on 05.09.2024. Since then, no further witness has been examined by the learned counsel for the plaintiff. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned with a cautionary note to the plaintiffs side that, in case of failure, Section 17(3) CPC shall be invoked against them. Put off to------- 05.09.2025 for evidence of plaintiff side/ arguments on application under order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ , Hala
|
29-JUL-2025
|
PO is on casual leave. Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff and his counsel Mr. Taj Muhammad Memon advocate are present. Defendant and his cousnel are called absent. Learned DDA on behalf of official defendant No.05 to 09 is present. The record reflects that issues were framed by this Court on 08.05.2024, and subsequently, only one official witness, namely Shoukat Ali (Tapedar Tapo Khatiro/Mukhtiarkar Taluka Saeed), was examined on 05.09.2024. Since then, no further witness has been examined by the learned counsel for the plaintiff. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned with a cautionary note to the plaintiffs side that, in case of failure, Section 17(3) CPC shall be invoked against them. Put off to------- 22.08.2025 for evidence of plaintiff side/ arguments on application under order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ , Hala
|
09-JUL-2025
|
Matter called. Both parties are called absent, but their respective counsels are present. Learned DDA on behalf of official defendant No.05 to 09 is called absent. Arguments heard on application u/o 18 Rule 18 CPC from both the sides. Order passed on application, the application is hereby dismissed. Such order passed on separate sheet and announced in open Court. The record reflects that issues were framed by this Court on 08.05.2024, and subsequently, only one official witness, namely Shoukat Ali (Tapedar Tapo Khatiro/Mukhtiarkar Taluka Saeed), was examined on 05.09.2024. Since then, no further witness has been examined by the learned counsel for the plaintiff. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned with a cautionary note to the plaintiffs side that, in case of failure, Section 17(3) CPC shall be invoked against them. Put off to------- 29.07.2025 for evidence of plaintiff side/ arguments on application under order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ , Hala
|