29-OCT-2025
|
|
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge - I, Mithi
|
15-OCT-2025
|
Suit called. Attorney of plaintiff is present alongwith his learned counsel. Attorney of defendants is present alongwith his learned counsel Mr. Chander Kolhi. Official defendants# 4 to 7 & 10 are called absent. Suit is fixed for written statement by by official defendants. Learned counsel for defendants has filed application u/o 7 rule 11 CPC at Ex.9. Order passed on it. Put off to.........29.10.2025 for written statement by official defendants/objections of application u/o 7 rule 11 CPC. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge - I, Mithi
|
01-OCT-2025
|
Suit called. Attorney of plaintiff is present while his learned counsel is called absent. Attorney of defendants is present while his counsel is called absent. Official defendants# 4 to 7 & 10 are called absent. Suit is fixed for written statement by by official defendants. Word is suspended on the request of Bar. Put off to.........15.10.2025 for written statement by official defendants. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge - I, Mithi
|
17-SEP-2025
|
Suit called. Plaintiff and his learned counsel are present. Defendants#1 is present, while their counsel is called absent. Official defendants# 4 to 7 & 10 are called absent. Suit is fixed for written statement by by official defendants. Time to file Written statement by official defendants is due. Put off to......... 01.10.2025 for written statement by official defendants. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge - I, Mithi
|
02-SEP-2025
|
Suit called. One namely Kirshan is present on behalf of Plaintiff, while his learned counsel is called absent. Defendants#1 to 3 are absent, while their counsel is present. Official defendants# 4 to 7 & 10 are called absent. Suit is fixed for written statement by all defendants. Learned advocate for the defendants has filed W.S on behalf of defendants No.1 to 3 at Ex.8. Order passed on it. Put off to......... 17.09.2025 for written statement by official defendants. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge - I, Mithi
|
19-AUG-2025
|
Suit called. Plaintiff is absent while, his learned counsel is present. Defendants#1 to 3 are absent while, their counsel is present. Official defendants# 4 to 7 & 10 are absent. Suit is fixed for written statement by defendants No.1 to 7 & 10 & return of process of defendants No.8 & 9. The process of defendants#8 & 9 returned duly served, as per report of bailiff of the Court of Hon'ble District & Sessions Judge, Mirpurkhas vide letter No.2843 of 2025, dated: 25.07.2025. Hence; service upon defendants# 8 & 9 found satisfactory & is held good. Such order passed on order sheet. Learned advocate for the plaintiff submitted E-Stamp worth Rs.15000/- along with statement. File. Learned counsel for the private defendants moved an application for grant of time to file WS. Order passed on it. Time granted. Learned advocate for the plaintiff has not pressed the application U/O 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC. Order passed and announced in open Court. Per order, the application stands dismissed as not pressed. Put off to......... 02.09.2025 for written statement by all defendants. |
For Service |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge - I, Mithi
|
29-JUL-2025
|
Suit called. Plaintiff is absent while, his learned counsel is present. Suit is fixed for service upon all defendants. Process returned served upon defendants No.3 to 5 and un-served upon defendants No.1 & 2, as per report of bailiff of the Court of learned CJ & JM Nagarparkar vide letter No.724/2025, dated: 26.07.2025. The process returned served upon defendants No.6 & 7 as per report of bailiff of this Court. The process also returned served upon defendant No.10, as per report of bailiff of the Court of learned 1st Senior Civil Judge, Hyderabad vide letter No.1836/2025, dated: 22.07.2025. The defendants No.1 to 3 appeared and engaged their counsel Mr. Haman Das Kolhi, who is present and filed his vakalatnama on their behalf. Learned counsel for the private defendants moved an application for grant of time to file written statement on behalf of defendants NO.1 to 3. Hence; the service upon defendants No. 1 to 7 & 10 found satisfactory & is held good. Such order also passed on order sheet. The process of defendants No.8 & 9 did not return. Put off to......... 19.08.2025 for written statement by defendants No.1 to 7 & 10 & return of process of defendants No.8 & 9. |
For Service |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge - I, Mithi
|