| Hearing Date | Diary | Status | Units / Application | Witness | Court |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23-NOV-2026 Restored (1) |
For Hearing | 0 | 0 | ADJ V, Shaheed Benazirabad | |
| 31-OCT-2026 Restored (1) |
The PO is on C/leave. The application of applicant/complainant Muhammad Akram for re-opening the case is called. The applicant is not present. Advocate for complainant is not present his Associate is present. Accused Raheem Bux @ Ameero and Imamdin are called absent. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for accused is present and file application for excuse the absence of accused persons, Order passed thereon. No PW is present. Case put off to: 23.11.2026, for further proceedings. Issue NBW against the private PWs through SHO Concerned. | For Hearing | 0 | 0 | ADJ V, Shaheed Benazirabad |
| 14-OCT-2026 Restored (1) |
The application of applicant/complainant Muhammad Akram for re-opening the case is called. The applicant is not present. Advocate for complainant is not present his Associate is present. Accused Raheem Bux @ Ameero and Imamdin are present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for accused is not present, Associate is present. PW Tapedar Iqbal Ahmed Dahri is present othe called absent. Pw Tapedar Iqbal Ahmed Filed application adjournment application he stating therein that he is not feeling well. Order on it. Matter adjourned. Case put off to: 31.10.2026, for further proceedings. Issue NBW against the private PWs through SHO Concerned. Accused Raheem @ Ameero and Imamuddin are directed to attend. | For Hearing | 0 | 0 | ADJ V, Shaheed Benazirabad |
| 23-SEP-2026 Restored (1) |
The application of applicant/complainant Muhammad Akram for re-opening the case is called. The applicant is not present. Advocate for complainant is not present, Associate is present. Accused Raheem Bux @ Ameero and Imamdin are present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for accused is not present, Associate is present. With consent, the matter is adjourned. Case put off to: 14.10.2026, for further proceedings. Issue BWs against the private PWs through SHO Concerned. Accused Raheem @ Ameero and Imamuddin are directed to attend. | For Hearing | 0 | 0 | ADJ V, Shaheed Benazirabad |
| 02-SEP-2026 Restored (1) |
The application of applicant/complainant Muhammad Akram for re-opening the case is called. The applicant is not present. Advocate for complainant is not present, Associate is present. Accused Raheem Bux @ Ameero is present on bail, while accused Imamdin is called absent. Co-accused Raheem Bux @ Ameero file the application for excuse the absence of the accused Imam Din, Order passed thereon. Condoned. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for accused is not present, Associate is present. With consent, the matter is adjourned. Case put off to: 23.09.2026, for further proceedings. Accused Raheem @ Ameero is directed to attend. | For Hearing | 0 | 0 | ADJ V, Shaheed Benazirabad |
| 03-AUG-2026 Restored (1) |
The PO is on C/leave. The application of applicant/complainant Muhammad Akram for re-opening the case is called. The applicant is not present. Advocate for complainant is not present, Associate is present. Accused Raheem Bux @ Ameero and Imamdin are present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for accused is not present, Associate is present. With consent, the matter is adjourned. Case put off to: 02.09.2026, for further proceedings. Both accused are directed to attend. | For Hearing | 0 | 0 | ADJ V, Shaheed Benazirabad |
| 11-JUL-2026 Restored (1) |
Work Suspended by the District Bar SBA. The application of applicant/complainant Muhammad Akram for re-opening the case is called. The applicant is not present. Advocate for complainant is not present, Associate is present. Accused Raheem Bux @ Ameero and Imamdin are present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for accused is not present, Associate is present. Case put off to: 03.08.2026, for further proceedings. Both accused are directed to attend. | For Hearing | 0 | 0 | ADJ V, Shaheed Benazirabad |
| 15-JUN-2026 Restored (1) |
The application of applicant/complainant Muhammad Akram for re-opening the case is called. The applicant is not present. Advocate for complainant is not present, Associate is present. Accused Raheem Bux @ Ameero and Imamdin are present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for accused is not present, Associate is present. Case put off to: 11.07.2026, for further proceedings. Both accused are directed to attend. | For Hearing | 0 | 0 | ADJ V, Shaheed Benazirabad |
| 25-MAY-2026 Restored (1) |
The application of applicant/complainant Muhammad Akram for re-opening the case is called. The applicant is not present. Advocate for complainant is present. Accused Raheem Bux @ Ameero and Imamdin are called absent. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for accused is present and file application for excuse the absence of both accused, Order passed thereon. Condoned. Matter put off to: 15.06.2026, for further proceedings. | For Hearing | 0 | 0 | ADJ V, Shaheed Benazirabad |
| 30-MAR-2024 |
Case and application u/s.265-K Cr.PC called. Accused Raheem Bux alias Ameero and Imamuddin are present on bail. Accused Abdul Hameed called absent and having been already declared as P.O. Accused Umar Hayat has been died and proceedings against him is already abated. Incharge ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Ahsan Gul Dahri Advocate for complainant thrice called absent. Mr. Ali Raza Channa Advocate of present accused person is present. No PW is present. Process u/s. 87 Cr.PC against complainant and his private PWs returned un-served. Order passed on the endorsement of process server. Let the statement of process server be recorded. Process server HC-Khan MUhammad is present his statement recorded at EX.NO.09. He returned process u/s. 87 Cr.PC against complainant and his private PWs and produced his endorsement, mashirnama of publication/Ishithar with CNICs of mashirs, photocopy of publication/Ishtihar and photocopy of departure and arrival entry of PS daulatpur respectively at EX.NO.09/A to 09/E. Report u/s. 88 Cr.PC against complainant and his private PWs also received from concerned Mukhtiarkar at EX.NO.10. Order passed on it. Filed. Heard both sides on application u/s 265-K Cr.P.C. Order passed on separate sheet at EX.NO.11 and announced in open Court. Application u/s. 265-K Cr.PC dismissed and the proceedings of this case stopped till appearance of complainant and PWs. Both present accused persons are present on bail and they are released till the appearance of witnesses subject to their personal P.R bonds, however the prosecution is at liberty to file an application for re-opening the proceedings of the case after getting the presence/attendance of remaining PWs including complainant. Present Both accused furnished their P.R bond which is kept on record. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ V, Shaheed Benazirabad |