04-NOV-2025
|
The matter called. The learned advocates of the appellant and advocate for respondents No. 1,4,5 and 9 are present. The learned DDA is present on behalf of official respondents. Heard their arguments. Judgment passed and announced in open Court. Civil Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Let such Decree be prepared accordingly. |
For Arguments |
0 |
0 |
ADJ V, Hyderabad
|
16-OCT-2025
|
The matter called. The appellant is present. DDA is present. The advocate for appellant is present. Heard his further arguments. Mr. Najaf Ali Khan associate of advocate for respondent appeared and filed adjournment application on the ground that Mr. Barrister Jawad advocate for respondent is busy before Honourable High Court in other matters. Order passed on adjournment application. Granted. Put of to 04.11.2025 for arguments of respondent side. |
For Arguments |
0 |
0 |
ADJ V, Hyderabad
|
30-SEP-2025
|
The matter called. The appellant is present. Mr. Irfan Ahmed Qureshi advocate for appellant is present. Heard arguments learned advocate for appellant .The DDA is present. Mr. Javad Ahmed Qureshi advocate appeared and filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.9 and requested for adjournment on the ground that he is busy before Honourable High Court in other cases. Request allowed. Other respondents are not present. Put of to 16.10.2025 for arguments of all the respondents. |
For Arguments |
0 |
0 |
ADJ V, Hyderabad
|
17-SEP-2025
|
The matter called. The appellant and his advocate are present. The respondents are not present. Mr. Jawad Ahmed Qureshi advocate sent Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No. 5, he also sent statement, that he will file Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No. 9 till next date of hearing. Mr. Najab Ali Khan associate to advocate for Respondent No. 5 requested for adjournment. The learned DDA is present on behalf of official respondents. At his request this matter is adjourned to-----30.09.2025 for arguments. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
ADJ V, Hyderabad
|
28-AUG-2025
|
The matter called. The appellant and his advocate are present. The associate for advocate for respondent No.1 to 4 Mr. Hamadullah advocate is present on behalf of respondent No.1 to 4. He filed statement with undertaking for filing vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.5 on next date of hearing. Order on it. File. Other respondent not present. At the request of learned advocate for respondent No.1 to 4, matter is adjourned. Put of to 17.9.2025 for filing vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.5 and argument. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
ADJ V, Hyderabad
|
12-AUG-2025
|
The matter called. The appellant and his advocate are present. Mr. Barrister Hammadullah and Zulfiqar Ali Buriro sent vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.1,3 and 4 through Mr. Aqib Hussain and on his request copies supplied to him and also requested for adjournment. Request allowed. Matter is adjourned to 28.8.2025 for objections. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
ADJ V, Hyderabad
|
24-JUL-2025
|
The matter called. The appellant and his advocate are present. The DDA is present on behalf of official respondent. Mr. Barrister Jawad Ahmed Qureshi sent statement through his associate with undertaking to file vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No. 1,3 and 4 on next date of hearing and requested for adjournment. Request allowed. At the request of learned advocate for respondent No.1,3 & 4 Put of to 12.8.2025 for filing objection by the respondent. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
ADJ V, Hyderabad
|
02-JUL-2025
|
The matter called. The appellant is present. Mr. Irfan Ahmed Qureshi advocate appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of appellant. The respondents called absent. The learned DDAA is present on behalf of respondent No.10 to 13. The service of process was already held good against the respondents No.7(a) and 8(a) and 10 to 13. The record shows that repeated process was issued against the remaining respondents through bailiff, registered post A.D, TCS, pasting and publication of notice in daily newspaper Kawaish dated 14.11.2024. The process was also served upon employee Lal Khan on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4. The record further shows that the remaining respondents despite of having knowledge about pendency of this appeal are intentionally and deliberately avoiding to appear to defend them in this appeal. In above circumstances, service of process is held good against all the remaining respondents. Put of to 24.07.2025 for filing objections by the remaining respondents. Call R&Ps |
For Service |
0 |
0 |
ADJ V, Hyderabad
|
15-MAY-2025
|
The matter called. The advocate for appellant is present. parties are not present. The process not returned. Put of to 02.7.2025 for service. Repeat process against the respondent as before on costs. |
For Service |
0 |
0 |
ADJ V, Hyderabad
|
18-APR-2025
|
The matter called. The appellant is present. The respondents are not present. The learned advocate for the appellant is not present. His junior is present. Costs not paid by the appellant. He requested to condone delay deposit of process fee. His request is allowed subject to deposit of process fee with five days. Due to strike of advocates the matter is adjourned to------15-05-2025 for service. Repeat process against remaining respondents on costs. The appellant is directed to deposit process fee within five days. |
For Service |
0 |
0 |
ADJ V, Hyderabad
|