Hearing(s) Detail

Ist Class Civil Suits 101/2023, Abdul Jabbar Pathan and others V/S Shahid Hussain Pathan and others

Hearing(s) Detail

Hearing Date Diary Status Units / Application Witness Court
07-OCT-2026
For Evidence 0 0 SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
16-SEP-2026
Honourable Presiding Officer is on Casual Leave.
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1, who is also attorney for rest of plaintiffs is absent with counsel Mr. Gulsher Junejo. Defendants No.1 to 5, 7 (defendant No.6/A being legal heir of deceased defendant No.6), 8 (defendant No.6/B being legal heir of deceased defendant No.6), 9, 10, 11 to 16, 25, 27, 28 (defendant No.30/A being legal heir of deceased defendant No.30), 29 (defendant No.30/B being legal heir of deceased defendant No.30), 30/C and 33 to 38 have already been proceeded ex-parte. Defendant No.18, who is attorney for defendants No.17, 19 and 20, is called absent; however, their learned counsel present. Defendant No.26 Muhammad Alim, who is attorney for defendant No.32, is absent. Defendant No.31 Muhammad Ayoob, who is attorney for defendants No.21 to 24, is called absent with their counsel. Put off to 07-10-2026, for Evidence of Plaintiff side.
For Evidence 0 0 SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
31-AUG-2026
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1, who is also attorney for rest of plaintiffs is absent, his counsel Mr. Gulsher Junejo. Defendants No.1 to 5, 7 (defendant No.6/A being legal heir of deceased defendant No.6), 8 (defendant No.6/B being legal heir of deceased defendant No.6), 9, 10, 11 to 16, 25, 27, 28 (defendant No.30/A being legal heir of deceased defendant No.30), 29 (defendant No.30/B being legal heir of deceased defendant No.30), 30/C and 33 to 38 have already been proceeded ex-parte. Defendant No.18, who is attorney for defendants No.17, 19 and 20, is called absent; however, their learned counsel present. Defendant No.26 Muhammad Alim, who is attorney for defendant No.32, is absent. Defendant No.31 Muhammad Ayoob, who is attorney for defendants No.21 to 24, is called absent with their counsel. Today matter was fixed for filing of List of witnesses and documetns to be filed from either parties, but no contesting party filed List of witnesses and documents. Put off to 16-09-2026, for Evidence of Plaintiff side. Supply of Copies 0 0 SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
24-AUG-2026
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1, who is also attorney for rest of plaintiffs is present with counsel Mr. Gulsher Junejo. Defendants No.1 to 5, 7 (defendant No.6/A being legal heir of deceased defendant No.6), 8 (defendant No.6/B being legal heir of deceased defendant No.6), 9, 10, 11 to 16, 25, 27, 28 (defendant No.30/A being legal heir of deceased defendant No.30), 29 (defendant No.30/B being legal heir of deceased defendant No.30), 30/C and 33 to 38 have already been proceeded ex-parte. Defendant No.18, who is attorney for defendants No.17, 19 and 20, is called absent; however, their learned counsel present. Defendant No.26 Muhammad Alim, who is attorney for defendant No.32, is absent. Defendant No.31 Muhammad Ayoob, who is attorney for defendants No.21 to 24, is called absent with their counsel. The Compliance of Order 10 Rule 2 CPC is hereby ordered to be failed. The Issues are framed by this Court at Ex.No. .Put off to 31-08-2026, for List of witnesses and documents from contesting parties. Compliance 1 0 SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
10-AUG-2026
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1, who is also attorney for rest of plaintiffs is present with counsel Mr. Gulsher Junejo. Defendants No.1 to 5, 7 (defendant No.6/A being legal heir of deceased defendant No.6), 8 (defendant No.6/B being legal heir of deceased defendant No.6), 9, 10, 11 to 16, 25, 27, 28 (defendant No.30/A being legal heir of deceased defendant No.30), 29 (defendant No.30/B being legal heir of deceased defendant No.30), and 33 to 38 have already been proceeded ex-parte. Defendant No.18, who is attorney for defendants No.17, 19 and 20, is called absent; however, their learned counsel present. Defendant No.26 Muhammad Alim, who is attorney for defendant No.32, is absent. Defendant No.31 Muhammad Ayoob, who is attorney for defendants No.21 to 24, is called absent; however, their learned counsel present. Defendant No. 30/C is called absent and not yet filed WS through mandatory period has been passed, therefore, defendant No.30/C is hereby debarred and ordered to be proceeded exparte. Put off to 24-08-2026, for compliance of Order 1 R: 10 (2) CPC, heading on 39 R: 1 & 2 CPC. For W/S/Objections/C.A. 0 0 SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
23-JUN-2026
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1, who is also attorney for rest of plaintiffs is present with counsel Mr. Gulsher Junejo. Defendants No.1 to 5, 7 (defendant No.6/A being legal heir of deceased defendant No.6), 8 (defendant No.6/B being legal heir of deceased defendant No.6), 9, 10, 11 to 16, 25, 27, 28 (defendant No.30/A being legal heir of deceased defendant No.30), 29 (defendant No.30/B being legal heir of deceased defendant No.30), and 33 to 38 have already been proceeded ex-parte. Defendants No.6 and 30 have expired. Defendant No.18, who is attorney for defendants No.17, 19 and 20, is called absent; however, their learned counsel present. Defendant No.26 Muhammad Alim, who is attorney for defendant No.32, is absent. Defendant No.31 Muhammad Ayoob, who is attorney for defendants No.21 to 24, is called absent; however, their learned counsel present. Process issued to defendant No. 30/C through publication. Learned counsel for plaintiff presented copy of newspaper daily Kawish Hyderabad dated 10.08.2026, in which Summons is published. Order thereon. Let service upon defendant No. 30/C be held good. Put off to 10-08-2026, for WS/Objections./appearance. For W/S/Objections/C.A. 0 0 SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
08-JUN-2026
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1, who is also attorney for rest of plaintiffs is present without counsel Mr. Gulsher Junejo. Defendants No.5, 7 (defendant No.6/A being legal heir of deceased defendant No.6), 8 (defendant No.6/B being legal heir of deceased defendant No.6), 9, 10, 25, 27, 28 (defendant No.30/A being legal heir of deceased defendant No.30), 29 (defendant No.30/B being legal heir of deceased defendant No.30), and 33 to 38 have already been proceeded ex-parte. Defendants No.6 and 30 have expired. Defendant No.18, who is attorney for defendants No.17, 19 and 20, is called absent; however, their learned counsel present. Defendant No.26 Muhammad Alim, who is attorney for defendant No.32, is present. Defendant No.31 Muhammad Ayoob, who is attorney for defendants No.21 to 24, is called absent; however, their learned counsel present. Defendants No.1 to 4 and 11 to 16 have already been made exparte. Defendant NO. 30/C is absent and not yet served. Process not issued to him byway of publication. Issue publication notice as already ordered. Put off to 23-06-2026, for service. For W/S/Objections/C.A. 0 0 SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
13-MAY-2026
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1, who is also attorney for rest of plaintiffs is present without counsel Mr. Gulsher Junejo. Defendants No.5, 7 (defendant No.6/A being legal heir of deceased defendant No.6), 8 (defendant No.6/B being legal heir of deceased defendant No.6), 9, 10, 25, 27, 28 (defendant No.30/A being legal heir of deceased defendant No.30), 29 (defendant No.30/B being legal heir of deceased defendant No.30), and 33 to 38 have already been proceeded ex-parte. Defendants No.6 and 30 have expired. Defendant No.18, who is attorney for defendants No.17, 19 and 20, is called absent; however, their learned counsel present. Defendant No.26 Muhammad Alim, who is attorney for defendant No.32, is present. Defendant No.31 Muhammad Ayoob, who is attorney for defendants No.21 to 24, is called absent; however, their learned counsel present. Defendants No.1 to 4 and 11 to 16 have already been made exparte. Defendant NO. 30/C is absent and not yet served. Process not issued to him byway of publication. Issue publication notice as already ordered. Put off to 08-06-2026, for service. For Service 0 0 SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
29-APR-2026
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1, who is also attorney for rest of plaintiffs is present with counsel Mr. Gulsher. Defendants No.5, 7 (defendant No.6/A being legal heir of deceased defendant No.6), 8 (defendant No.6/B being legal heir of deceased defendant No.6), 9, 10, 25, 27, 28 (defendant No.30/A being legal heir of deceased defendant No.30), 29 (defendant No.30/B being legal heir of deceased defendant No.30), and 33 to 38 have already been proceeded ex-parte. Defendants No.6 and 30 have expired. Defendant No.18, who is attorney for defendants No.17, 19 and 20, is called absent; however, their learned counsel is present. Defendant No.26 Muhammad Alim, who is attorney for defendant No.32, is present. Defendant No.31 Muhammad Ayoob, who is attorney for defendants No.21 to 24, is called absent; however, their learned counsel present. Defendants No.1 to 4 and 11 to 16 have already been made exparte. Mr. Gulsher filed application U/O 5 R: 20 CPC, which is heard and allowed. Let the publication be made against defendant NO.30/c in newspaper daily Kawish Hyderabad on costs of plaintiff. Put off to 13-05-2026, for service For Service 0 0 SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
15-APR-2026
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1, who is also attorney for the remaining plaintiffs, is present, counsel for plaintiffs is also present. Defendants No.5, 7 (defendant No.6/A being legal heir of deceased defendant No.6), 8 (defendant No.6/B being legal heir of deceased defendant No.6), 9, 10, 25, 27, 28 (defendant No.30/A being legal heir of deceased defendant No.30), 29 (defendant No.30/B being legal heir of deceased defendant No.30), and 33 to 38 have already been proceeded ex-parte. Defendants No.6 and 30 have expired. Defendant No.18, who is attorney for defendants No.17, 19 and 20, is called absent; however, their learned counsel is present. Defendant No.26 Muhammad Alim, who is attorney for defendant No.32, is present. Defendant No.31 Muhammad Ayoob, who is attorney for defendants No.21 to 24, is called absent; however, their learned counsel is present. Defendants No.1 to 4 and 11 to 16 have already been served on 23.01.2026, but called absent and have not yet filed their written statements/objections, therefore, defendants NO. 1 to 4, 11 to 16 are hereby debarred and ordered to be proceeded as exparte. Put off to 29-04-2026, for service of newly joined defendant No. 30/C. Issue process as already ordered on costs. For Service 0 0 SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot